Manajemen Inovasi Digital dan Etika Organisasi dalam Penguatan Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Pemerintahan Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37950/joc.v5i1.682Abstract
This article examines the role of digital innovation management and organizational ethics in strengthening transparency and accountability in Indonesian government institutions. The article is grounded in the argument that digital transformation in the public sector should not be understood merely as technological modernization, but as an organizational management process involving leadership, institutional capacity, coordination, control systems, and public value orientation. This study uses a qualitative approach with a narrative literature review design based on journal articles, books, regulations, official government documents, and reports from international institutions relevant to digital government, public sector management, organizational integrity, and accountability. The findings show that electronic-based government systems, e-procurement, open data, online complaint platforms, and data-driven auditing can improve managerial effectiveness through stronger traceability, wider access to information, and better institutional control. However, the effectiveness of these instruments depends on organizational capacity, managerial commitment, data governance quality, interoperability, internal control mechanisms, and digital inclusion. The article concludes that successful digital transformation in Indonesian government requires the integration of digital innovation management, organizational ethics, and institutional control in order to produce not only procedural transparency but also substantive accountability and improved governance performance.
Keywords: digital innovation management; organizational ethics; transparency; accountability; public sector management
References
Ahn, M. J., & Bretschneider, S. (2017). The politics of e-government: E-government and the political control of bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 33–45.
Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006
Bonina, C., & Eaton, B. (2020). Cultivating open government data platform ecosystems through governance: Lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Montevideo. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), Article 101479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101479
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Brown, D. C. G., & Toze, S. (2017). Information governance in digitized public administration. Canadian Public Administration, 60(4), 581–604.
Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005
Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003
Fan, B., & Zhao, Y. (2017). The moderating effect of external pressure on the relationship between internal organizational factors and the quality of open government data. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 396–405.
Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469955
Gandía, J. L., Marrahí, L., & Huguet, D. (2016). Digital transparency and Web 2.0 in Spanish city councils. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 28–39.
Gascó-Hernández, M., Martin, E. G., Reggi, L., Pyo, S., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2018). Promoting the use of open government data: Cases of training and engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 233–242.
Gonzalez-Zapata, F., & Heeks, R. (2015). The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 441–452.
Heeks, R. (2018). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Routledge.
Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2016). Anti-corruption initiatives in South Korea: An empirical study of the KONEPS e-procurement system. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(4), 691–708.
Lindgren, I., & van Veenstra, A. F. (2018). Digital government transformation: A case illustrating public e-service development as part of public sector transformation. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age (pp. 1–6). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209302
Lindquist, E. A., & Huse, I. (2017). Accountability and monitoring government in the digital era: Promise, realism and research for digital-era governance. Canadian Public Administration, 60(4), 627–656.
Lourenço, R. P. (2015). An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006
Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Janowski, T. (2021). Design principles for creating digital transparency in government. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), Article 101550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101550
Menzel, D. C. (2015). Ethics management for public administrators: Leading and building organizations of integrity. Routledge.
Mergel, I., Kleibrink, A., & Sörvik, J. (2018). Open data outcomes: U.S. cities between product and process innovation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 622–632.
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2017). The quest for good governance: How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge University Press.
OECD. (2017). Recommendation of the Council on Public Integrity. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). Government at a glance 2019. OECD Publishing.
Pemerintah Indonesia. (2004). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 42 Tahun 2004 tentang Pembinaan Jiwa Korps dan Kode Etik Pegawai Negeri Sipil.
Pemerintah Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik.
Pemerintah Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.
Pemerintah Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik.
Pemerintah Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Satu Data Indonesia.
Svara, J. H. (2015). The ethics primer for public administrators in government and nonprofit organizations (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Transparency International. (2020). Corruption perceptions index 2020. Transparency International.
United Nations. (2020). United Nations e-government survey 2020: Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development. United Nations.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Author and Journal of Citizenship
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Citizenship (JOC) agree to the following Open Access terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Journal of Citizenship (JOC) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
