Soft Power Versus Hard Power: International Political Strategies of Great Powers

Authors

  • Yusran Yusran Universitas Budi Luhur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v7i2.539

Keywords:

Soft Power, Hard Power, Smart Power, International Politics, United States, China

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to analyze the use of soft power and hard power strategies in international politics carried out by major countries, and to understand how these two approaches complement or compete with each other in achieving national interests. Using descriptive qualitative methods, this study examines case studies in the United States and China over the last decade. The results of this study indicate that the hard power and soft power strategies implemented by the United States and China have a significant impact on the dynamics of international politics, both in the form of competition for global influence, regional stability, and changes in the world economic order. The United States tends to use its military superiority to ensure deterrence and enforce interests through economic sanctions, while its soft power derived from popular culture and democratic values remains a strong attraction in many countries. In contrast, China focuses on economic diplomacy through massive investment and strengthening trade relations that increase the dependence of its partners, accompanied by the modernization of its military as a guarantee of protecting strategic interests. The combination of the strategies of the two countries not only triggers competition in promoting development and governance models, but also creates a more complex international landscape, where narratives and public perceptions become new fields of competition besides the power of weapons and economy. Keywords: Soft Power, Hard Power, Smart Power, International Politics, United States, China

References

Arwanto, A., & Anggraini, W. (2021). Dinamika ekonomi politik global dan pembagian kerja internasional. Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja, 23-34.

Ramadhan, F. V., & Chaerul, A. (2023). Peluang dan Tantangan Indonesia Menuju Poros Maritim Dunia: Perspektif Politik Internasional. TUTURAN: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(3), 262-272.

Nye, J. S. (1990). Soft power. Foreign policy, (80), 153-171.

Ohnesorge, H. W. (2020). Soft power. Reut Institute.

Lemke, D. (2016). Dimensions of hard power: Regional leadership and material capabilities. In Regional leadership in the global system (pp. 31-50). Routledge.

Campbell, K. M., & O'Hanlon, M. E. (2006). Hard power: The new politics of national security. Basic Books (AZ).

Brannagan, P. M., Giulianotti, R., & Grix, J. (2025). Sport and Power: hard power, soft power and smart power. Leisure Studies, 1-15.

Nye Jr, J. S. (2009). Smart power. New Perspectives Quarterly, 26(2), 7-9.

Suwarman, E., Watunwotuk, K., Melianti, L., Rosari, M., Yewen, N., & Naomi, R. (2018). Rivalitas Geopolitik Amerika Serikat €“Tiongkok Di Myanmar. Jurnal Asia Pacific Studies, 2(2), 180-191.

Dwiguna, A. R., & Rofii, M. S. (2019). Rivalitas Amerika Serikat-Tiongkok Di Laut China Selatan Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Stratejik Ketahanan Nasional, 2(2), 6.

Rum, A. R. (2019). Kebijakan Soft Diplomacy Republik Rakyat Tiongkok Dalam Peningkatan Hubungan Bilateral Dengan Amerika Serikat. WANUA: Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 4(1), 19-42.

Ohashi, H. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the context of China’s opening-up policy. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 7(2), 85-103.

Clarke, M. (2017). The Belt and Road Initiative: China's new grand strategy?. Asia Policy, 24(1), 71-79.

Harahap, C. N. M., Karisma, G., & Rakhmadi, R. (2023). Strategi Smart Power Tiongkok dalam Dimensi Ruang Angkasa guna Mengimbangi Kekuatan Amerika Serikat Tahun 2013-2021. Glocal Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa, 1(1), 17-33.

Kurlantzick, J. (2007). Charm offensive: How China's soft power is transforming the world. Yale University Press.

Hartig, F. (2016). How China understands public diplomacy: The importance of national image for national interests. International Studies Review, 18(4), 655-680.

Yulianah, S. E. (2022). Metodelogi Penelitian Sosial. CV Rey Media Grafika.

Zhang, Z. (2018). The belt and road initiative: China’s new geopolitical strategy?. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 4(03), 327-343.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-10

Issue

Section

Articles